Research-aware routing
Compare claims, sources, or alternatives and return the next approved route instead of another paragraph.
Decision model · Perplexity
PPLX Decider is a strong fit when an agent must compare evidence, rank alternatives, or route a research task without making your application parse prose.
Use the exact model ID in the request. Credits follow the same Jev rule as the other decision models.
A decision boundary
perplexity/pplx-decider-v1-27bState
Two vendors meet the reliability requirement. Vendor B is cheaper, but has weaker recent evidence.
Route to vendor A
0.78 confidence
Escalate if evidence is stale
The output is typed for your router, evaluator, or review queue.
Input
State + typed questions
Output
Choice · score · noul
Billing
Same as Jev
Endpoint
POST /v1/systemone
Why this model
Keep retrieval and actions in your application. Ask PPLX Decider for the bounded judgment in between.
Compare claims, sources, or alternatives and return the next approved route instead of another paragraph.
Choice, score, and noul map directly to application branches, confidence gates, and review policies.
Send only the state and criteria needed for this decision so the surrounding workflow stays inspectable.
Where it fits
PPLX Decider is most useful after your application has gathered context and before it commits to a route.
Evidence ranking
Compare sources, candidates, or claims
Return the best-supported option
Research triage
Decide whether a result is ready to use
Gate downstream drafting or action
Uncertainty handling
Detect weak or conflicting evidence
Send the case to human review
Call the model
The Jev API keeps the wire format stable across supported decision models. Change only the model ID when you want to compare behavior.
curl -X POST https://thejevai.com/v1/systemone \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <API_KEY>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "perplexity/pplx-decider-v1-27b",
"state": "A customer request needs a safe next step.",
"questions": {
"route": {
"type": "choice",
"instructions": "Choose the correct next step.",
"criteria": {
"continue": "Continue the approved workflow",
"review": "Send the case for human review"
}
}
}
}'Keep the API key on your server. The Playground uses the same request shape through your signed-in session.
Build with it
Start with a decision that has a clear owner, a small set of options, and an observable fallback.
Choose which source or candidate should move into the next step.
Gate an answer when evidence is incomplete, stale, or contradictory.
Turn uncertain research cases into explicit review work instead of silent guesses.
FAQ
Set model to perplexity/pplx-decider-v1-27b in the POST /v1/systemone request. The Playground exposes the same model in its model selector.
Yes. The supported decision models use the same Jev-based credit rule. Check your own production-like cases because latency, availability, and provider behavior can change.
No. Treat the response as a typed recommendation. Your application should own tool calls, writes, permissions, and human review.
References
Check current availability and provider-specific model details before production rollout.
Use the shared request, response, authentication, and error contract.
Measure routing accuracy, confidence calibration, and review rate with representative cases.
Start with a bounded question
Try PPLX Decider in the Playground, then move the same request to your server when the output is stable.